<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Allameh Tabataba’i University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Educational Technologies in Learning</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4256</Issn>
				<Volume>7</Volume>
				<Issue>23</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparison of academic vitality, academic self-handicapping and academic burnout of students in virtual and face-to-face education</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Comparison of academic vitality, academic self-handicapping and academic burnout of students in virtual and face-to-face education</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>155</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>184</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17670</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22054/jti.2024.78900.1450</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mozhgan</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mehrdadian</LastName>
<Affiliation>Master of Educational Psychology, Qaen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qaen, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Farokhro</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jalili</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Psychology Education and Counseling Department, Farhangian University, PO Box 889-14665, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Aim: The present study was conducted with the aim of comparing academic vitality, academic self-handicapping and academic burnout of primary school students in virtual and face-to-face education.&lt;br /&gt;Methods: The current research was of comparative causal type. The target society of the current research was formed by all the sixth-grade students of Birjand city in the academic year of 1400-1401. Among these 150 people, for each variable, 75 of the students who received face-to-face training and 75 of the students who followed the educational activities in the Shad educational network were selected by available sampling method. The research tools were Hossein Chari and Dehghanizadeh&#039;s academic vitality questionnaires (2013), Midgly&#039;s academic self-handicapping (2000) and Rostami et al.&#039;s academic burnout (2013). Independent t-test was used to analyze data in SPSS-26 software.&lt;br /&gt;Results: The findings of the research indicated that academic vitality was higher in students with face-to-face education; Also, the averages showed that academic self-handicapping was higher in students with virtual education, and in all components of academic burnout (emotional fatigue, doubt and pessimism, and inefficiency), its amount was higher in students with virtual education compared to face-to-face education (001/0&gt;p).&lt;br /&gt;Conclusions: According to the findings of the research, despite the inevitable psychological benefits of virtual education, conducting extensive and deeper research in the field of comparing virtual and face-to-face education seems necessary.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Aim: The present study was conducted with the aim of comparing academic vitality, academic self-handicapping and academic burnout of primary school students in virtual and face-to-face education.&lt;br /&gt;Methods: The current research was of comparative causal type. The target society of the current research was formed by all the sixth-grade students of Birjand city in the academic year of 1400-1401. Among these 150 people, for each variable, 75 of the students who received face-to-face training and 75 of the students who followed the educational activities in the Shad educational network were selected by available sampling method. The research tools were Hossein Chari and Dehghanizadeh&#039;s academic vitality questionnaires (2013), Midgly&#039;s academic self-handicapping (2000) and Rostami et al.&#039;s academic burnout (2013). Independent t-test was used to analyze data in SPSS-26 software.&lt;br /&gt;Results: The findings of the research indicated that academic vitality was higher in students with face-to-face education; Also, the averages showed that academic self-handicapping was higher in students with virtual education, and in all components of academic burnout (emotional fatigue, doubt and pessimism, and inefficiency), its amount was higher in students with virtual education compared to face-to-face education (001/0&gt;p).&lt;br /&gt;Conclusions: According to the findings of the research, despite the inevitable psychological benefits of virtual education, conducting extensive and deeper research in the field of comparing virtual and face-to-face education seems necessary.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">academic vitality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">academic self-handicapping</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Academic burnout</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Virtual Education</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">face-to-face education</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Elementary</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jti.atu.ac.ir/article_17670_84040973090431ca00de0ca4919fbe7d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
