Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

Abstract

The present study was designed to explore the experiences and perceptions of school principals regarding sustainable educational leadership and its role in fostering technology-oriented learners, employing qualitative approach with a phenomenological strategy. Employing a qualitative phenomenological approach, the study involved 20 school principals from Sanandaj selected through purposeful and snowball sampling. Inclusion criteria comprised a minimum of three years of managerial experience, familiarity with sustainable leadership practices, proficiency in educational technology, and the ability to articulate experiences clearly. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Data analysis followed Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis framework, encompassing three stages: identification of basic codes, organization into organizing themes, and synthesis into overarching themes. Findings revealed that principals perceive sustainable educational leadership as a multidimensional and meaning-oriented approach, encompassing guidance of technological transformation, teacher empowerment, fostering a professional culture, and consolidating a coherent digital ecosystem within schools. Key components include leading sustainable technological change, enhancing teachers’ digital capacity, promoting educational equity, and structuring a resilient school digital environment. The consequences of this leadership are also evident in enhancing the quality of technology-based learning, empowering teachers to facilitate student learning in technology-rich environments, shaping a digital professional identity for teachers, developing technological and self-directed learning skills in learners, and creating tangible organizational justice and cohesion. Consequently, sustainable educational leadership transcends short-term decisions and lays the groundwork for continuous learning, active participation, and professional development in schools, specifically preparing learners to face the challenges and opportunities of the digital age.

Keywords

Asis, M. (2025). Technology-Driven Strategies in Transformational Leadership: Practices of School Heads in Public Elementary Schools. International Journal of Sustainability and Advanced Integrated Research, 1(2), 47-54.‏
Ahmadi, M., Sheikh Eslami Kandlouci, N., & Zargar, S. M. (2019). The effect of flexibility and integration of information technology on organizational performance considering the role of organizational innovation. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Knowledge Management, Tehran, Iran.
Alhazemi, A. A. (2024). Transformative approaches to sustainable education: Technology, leadership and SDGs in higher education institutions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(5), 41-67.‏
Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. L. (2023). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 49-82.
Banoğlu, K., Vanderlinde, R., Çetin, M., & Aesaert, K. (2023). Role of school principals’ technology leadership practices in building a learning organization culture in public K-12 schools. Journal of School Leadership, 33(1), 66-91.‏
Enachescu, V. A., & Costache, B. (2025). EMPOWERING LEARNING THROUGH DIGITAL LEADERSHIP IN EDUCATION. In INTED2025 Proceedings (pp. 6814-6821). IATED.‏Davies, B. (2024). Leading the technology-powered school. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 67-90.
Flori, M., Raulea, E. C., & Raulea, C. (2025). Innovative leadership and sustainability in higher education management. Computers and Education Open, 100272.‏
Ridlo, S. I. (2025). PRINCIPAL AS A DIGITAL LEADER IN MANAGING TECHNOLOGY-BASED LEARNING. Innovative Pedagogy and Education Studies, 2(02 July), 64-73.‏
Hoy, A. W., Hoy, W. K., & Kurz, N. M. (2017). Teacher's academic optimism: The development and test of a new construct. Teaching and teacher education, 24(4), 821-835.
Isbahi, M. B. (2023). Optimizing Educational Leadership: Building Sustainable Education in the 5.0 Era. Anjasmoro: Islamic Interdisciplinary Journal, 1(1), 43-66.‏
Jackson, D. (2023). Relationship between principals' technological leadership and their schools' implementation of instructional technology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgia Southern University, 20-34.
Jedaman, P., Buaraphan, K., Pimdee, P., Yuenyong, C., Sukkamart, A., & Suksup, C. (2018, January). Analysis of sustainable leadership for science learning management in the 21st Century under education THAILAND 4.0 framework. In AIP conference proceedings (Vol. 1923, No. 1, p. 030062). AIP Publishing LLC.‏
Kadagidze, L., Gamsakhurdia, T., & Ugrelidze, D. E. TECHNOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE IN LEADERSHIP STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL HIGHER EDUCATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY.‏
Metsämuuronen, J., Kuosa, T., & Laukkanen, R. (2022). Sustainable leadership and future‐oriented decision making in the educational governance–a Finnish case. International journal of educational management, 27(4), 402-424.‏
Mwawasi, F. M. (2023). Technology leadership and ICT use: Strategies for capacity building for ICT integration.
Safarian, S., Fallah, V., & Mirhosseini, H. (2018). A comparison of the effects of instruction through educational software and traditional teaching methods on learning mathematics. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 2(1), 21–36.
Sanford, K., Hopper, T., Robertson, K., Bell, D., Collyer, V., & Lancaster, L. (2023). Sustainable leadership supporting educational transformation. in education, 25(2), 3-22.‏
Saud, M. S., et al. (2023). ICT application in Vocational and Technical Education and Training (VTET) Institutions in Malaysia. Proceedings of the International Conference on VTET Research and Networking, 23-33.
Salimi, J. , Ghobadi, A. and Aminnibag, A. (2025). Phenomenology of Teachers' Understanding and Perception of the Concepts of Curriculum and Lesson Planning. Learner-based Curriculum and Instruction Journal, 4(2), 109-135. doi: 10.22034/cipj.2025.65834.1228.
Salimi, J., Aminibagh, A., & Rezaei, K. (2025). Analysis of factors affecting the acceptance of curriculum innovations among elementary school teachers based on the Attention-Based Acceptance Model (CBAM). Teacher Professional Development, 10(2), 149–183.
Salimi, J., Mohammadi Lalabadi, M., & Amini Bagh, A. (2015). Elementary teachers’ experiences of research lessons: Implications for curriculum leadership. Qualitative Research in Curriculum, 6(18), 157–183. https://doi.org/10.22054/qric.2025.84276.402
Unal, S., & Ozturk, I. H. (2022). Barriers to ITC integration into teachers’ classroom practices: Lessons from a case study on social studies teachers in Turkey. World Applied Sciences Journal, 18(7), 939-944.
Uygur, M., Ayçiçek, B., Doğrul, H., & Yanpar Yelken, T. (2021). Investigating stakeholders’ views on technology integration: The role of educational leadership for sustainable inclusive education. Sustainability, 12(24), 10354.‏
Yusof, M. R., Awang, H., Yaakob, M. F. M., Jaafar, M. F., Ibrahim, M. Y., & Chaw, P. L. (2023). The sustainability of technology-aided leadership adoption among school leaders: If it could ever be this real forever. Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ, 2252, 8822-8847.‏
 
Azizi, A,. Salimi, J & Tanhayee, A.(2025).  An insight-based approach to higher education administration through mindfulness. International Journal of Educational Management, 39 (4): 1005-1027.   https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2024-0722 
Salimi, J., Azizi, A., Srisarajivakul, EN  & Sajadi, SA. (2025). Embracing Intercultural Trust: Cultivating Non-native Teachers' Cultural Humility in Iranian Kurdistan. International Journal of Multicultural Education , 27(3):123-150. DOI: 10.18251/ijme.v27i3.5755