Document Type : Research Paper
Author
Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 889-14665, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
The research with purpose identifying indicators of student teachers learning activities in curriculum of technology knowledge of elementary education and amount of attention to them was done. Design was combination of sequential exploratory type. In qualitative section, phenomenological method and in quantitative section, descriptive-survey method was used. Statistical population in qualitative section is professors and experts in field of technology based learning activities and in quantitative section, student teachers in field of elementary education. In qualitative section, 15 people were selected through purposive sampling and in quantitative section, 227 people were selected through stratified random sampling. Research data were collected through semi-structured interviews and researcher-made questionnaires. Determine validity of interview questions and questionnaire, face and content validity and Cronbach's alpha coefficient were used to estimate reliability of questionnaire. Thematic analysis method was used to analyze data in qualitative section, and descriptive and inferential statistics were used in quantitative section. Findings of research in qualitative section showed that indicators of learning activities in science and technology curriculum of field of elementary education included themes of independent learning, doing homework, active participation in education process, interaction with professors, access to different course content, sharing and skill and ability of student teachers in teaching using new educational technologies. Results of quantitative section also showed that level of attention paid to indicators of student teachers learning activities in curriculum of technology knowledge is at low level. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to technological knowledge in consolidated way in performing learning activities.
Keywords
ابراهیم پور، مریم و سبحانی نژاد، مهدی. (1394). ارزیابی وضع موجود و مطلوب برنامه درسی مجازی دانشگاهی از دید دانشجویان. پژوهش های آموزش و یادگیری، 12(2)، 89-106. https://doi.org/10.22070/2.7.89
ابراهیم پور کومله، سمیرا، نادری، عزت اله و سیف نراقی، مریم. (1397). شناسایی و بررسی ویژگی های مطلوب عناصر برنامه درسی برای نیل به پرورش مهارت های حل مسأله در درس مطالعات اجتماعی دوره ابتدایی تحصیلی. مطالعات آموزشی و آموزشگاهی، 6 (1)، 172-125. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.2423494.1396.6.1.6.3
اصغری اصل سردرود، مریم، ملکی آوارسین، صادق، بقایی، حسین و یاری حاج عطالو، جهانگیر. (1401). مطالعه ویژگی های عنصر برنامه درسی آموزش علوم مبتنی بر روش استیم. فصلنامه نوآوری های آموزشی،21 (4)، 132-105.
اشرافی، زهرا، بابامحمدی، حسن و نوبهار، منیر. (1398). مقایسه برنامه آموزشی مقطع کارشناسی ارشد پرستاری مراقبت های ویژه در ایران و ملبورن استرالیا و ارائه راه کارهای پیشنهادی برای ارتقاء در ایران: یک مطالعه توصیفی. نشریه آموزش پرستاری، 8 (4)، 18-9. http://jne.ir/article-1-1046-fa.html
باقریان فر، مصطفی، نصراصفهانی، احمدرضا و آهنچیان، محمدرضا. (1400). شناسایی شاخص های مطلوب برای فعالیت های یاددهی و یادگیری دروس رشته های علوم انسانی دانشگاه ها و میزان توجه به آنها. فصلنامه روانشناسی تربیتی، 17(60)، 364-327.
تابع بردبار، فریبا. (1395). تأثیر آموزش از طریق تلفن همراه بر جنبه های روان شناختی و تحصیلی دانشجویان. دو فصلنامه پژوهش های برنامه درسی، 6(1)، 145-127.
تلخابی، محمود. (1398). فعالیت های یادگیری (طراحی، اجرا و ارزشیابی). تهران: مؤسسه فرهنگی و هنری شناخت و تربیت انگاره.
جمشیدی توانا، اعظم و امام جمعه، محمدرضا (1395). بررسی تأثیر کارورزی فکورانه در برنامه درسی تربیت معلم بر رشد شایستگی های دانشجومعلمان. دو فصلنامه پژوهش های برنامه درسی، 6 (1)، 1-20.
خداویسی، سارا و سراجی، فرهاد. (1398). توسعه حرفه ای معلمان با استفاده از فضای مجازی: مطالعه پدیدارشناساسانه معلمان شهر همدان. فناوری آموزشی، 14(1)، 109-121.
فتحی واجارگاه، کورش. (1400). هویت های برنامه درسی. جلد اول، ویراست چهارم. تهران: انتشارات آییژ.
فرخی، افروز و طاطاری، علیرضا. (1399). کارورزی و تأثیر آن بر توانمندسازی دانشجومعلمان، نشریه پویش در آموزش علوم انسانی دانشگاه فرهنگیان، 6(21)، 14-1.
قره باغی، شراره و سلطان محمدی، زهره. (1389). فعالیت یادگیری بحث: رویکردی نوین در آموزش های مجازی، نشریه راهبردهای آموزش در علوم پژشکی، 3(1)، 39-35.
کاویانی بروجنی، مهدیس و فولادی، فاطمه. (1396). تأثیر طراحی آموزشی براساس دیدگاه ساخت گرایانه بر عملکرد تحصیلی دانش آموزان دختر پایه ششم در درس ریاضی. کنفرانس پژوهش های نوین ایران و جهان در مدیریت، اقتصاد، حسابداری و علوم انسانی.
file:///C:/Users/Win10-x64/Downloads/8851396h01131
کلاین، فرانسیس. (1383). الگوهای طراحی برنامه درسی (ترجمه محمود مهرمحمدی). مشهد: انتشارات آستان قدس رضوی.
Akker, J. V. D. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An Introduction: In J. van den Akker, U. Hameyer, & W. Kuiper (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1-10). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
Asghari Asl Sardroud, M., Maleki Avarsin, S., Beqaei, H. & Yari Haj Atalo, J. (1401). Studying the characteristics of science education curriculum element based on STEAM method. Educational Innovation Quarterly, 21(4), Winter 1401. https://doi.org/10.22034/jei.2022.331597.2280. [In Persian].
Ashrafi, Z., Babamohammadi, H. & Nobahar, M. (2018). Comparison of the Master's degree program of intensive care nursing in Iran and Melbourne, Australia and providing suggested solutions for promotion in Iran: a descriptive study. Journal of Nursing Education, 8 (4), October and November 2018. http://jne.ir/article-1-1046-fa.html. [In Persian].
Bagharianfar, M., Nasrasafhani, A. & Ahanchian, M. (1400). Identifying the desired indicators for teaching and learning activities of humanities courses in universities and the level of attention to them. Educational Psychology Quarterly, 17(60), Summer 1400, 364-327. https://doi.org/10.22054/jep.2022.53744.3069. [In Persian].
Beauchamp, G. (1981). Curriculum theory (4th Ed.). Itasca, Ill.: F.E. Peacock Publishers.
Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does (4th ed). Open University Press.
Brantley-Dias, L., & Ertmer, P. A. (2013). Goldilocks and TPACK: Is the construct just right. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 103-128.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L. & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63-73.
Ebrahimpour, M. & Sobhaninejad, M. (2014). Evaluation of the current and desirable situation of university virtual curriculum from the students' point of view. Teaching and Learning Research, (2) 22, 106-89. https://doi.org/10.22070/2.7.89. [In Persian].
Ebrahimpour Komleh, S., Naderi, E. & Sabef Naraghi, M. (2017). Identifying and examining the desirable features of the curriculum elements to achieve the development of problem solving skills in the social studies course of the elementary school. Educational and School Studies, 6(1), 100-135. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2423494.1396.6.1.6.3. [In Persian].
Eisner, E.W. (1994). Educational Imagination. Macmillan Publishing Company.
Farrokhi, A. & Tatari, A. (2019). Internship and its effect on the empowerment of student teachers, Povish in Humanities Education of Farhangian University, 6 (21), 1-14.
https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.27172260.1399.6.21.1.0. [In Persian].
Fathi Vajargah, K. (1400). Curriculum identities. The first volume, the fourth edition. Tehran: Aizh Publications. [In Persian].
Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers and Education, 57(3), 1953-1960.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and teaching, 8 (3), 381-391.
Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211-229.
Herrington J, Oliver R. (2002). Online learning design for dummies: Professional development strategies for beginning online designers. In: Barker P, Rebelsky S, editors. Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications. Chesapeake, VA: AACE; 2002. P. 1500- 5. Available from: http://www.editlib.org/p/9620.
Jamieson-Proctor, R., Finger, G. & Albion, P. R. (2010). Auditing the TPACK capabilities of final year teacher education students: Are they ready for the 21st century. In Proceedings of the 2010 Australian Computers in Education Conference (ACEC 2010) (pp. 1-12). Australian Council for Computers in Education.
Jamshidi Tawana, A. and Imam Juma, M. R. (2015). Investigating the effect of intellectual internship in the teacher training curriculum on the development of student teachers' competencies. Bi Quarterly of Curriculum Research, 6 (1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22099/jcr.2016.3838. [In Persian].
Jordens, J. Z. & Zepke, N. (2009). A network approach to curriculum quality assessment. Quality in Higher Education, 15, (3), 279-289.
Kaviani Borojni, M. & Fuladi, F. (2016). The effect of educational design based on the constructivist perspective on the academic performance of sixth grade female students in mathematics. The conference of new researches of Iran and the world in management, economics, accounting and humanities. file:///C:/Users/Win10x64/Downloads/8851396h01131.pdf. [In Persian].
Khodavisi, S. & Saraji, F. (2018). Professional development of teachers using virtual space: a phenomenological study of teachers in Hamadan city. Educational Technology, 14(1), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2018.3771.1939. [In Persian].
Kidwell, V. (2004). Homework. London: Continuum.
Klein, F. (1383). Curriculum design patterns (translated by Mahmoud Mehromhammadi). Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi Publishing House. [In Persian].
Klein, F. (1985). Curriculum Design. International Encyclopedia of Education: Curriculum Studies. Volume II. Husen, T. and Postlethwaite editors, Pergamon Press: Oxford England, 1985, pp. 1163-1170.
Klein, F. (2003). Rethinking the multiplicity of cognitive resources and curricular representations: Alternatives to learning styles and multiple intelligences. Journal of curriculum studies, 35(1), 45-81.
Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M. & Rosenberg, J. M. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge for teachers and teacher educators. In N. Bharati, & S. Mishra (Eds.), ICT integrated teacher education: A resource book (pp. 1-8). New Delhi: Commonwealth Educational Media Center for Asia.
Koper, R. (2006). Editorial: Current Research in Learning Design, Educational Technology & Society, 9 (1), 13-22.
Liu, Q., Zhang, S. & Wang, Q. (2015). Surveying Chinese in- service K12 teachers’ technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(1), 55-74.
Lunenburg, F. & Ornstein, A. (1996). Educational Administration: concepts and practices. Second Edition. Wadsworth Publishing Co. California. 27 (1), 65-90.
Malewski, E. (2010). Curriculum Studies Handbook the Next Moment. NY: Routledge.
Ozturk, S. Y. (2020). An Investigation of student teachers' engagement in autonomous outside the classroom learning activities. PASAA: Vol. 59, Article 6. DOI: 10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.59.1.6.
Papanikolaou, K., Gouli, E., & Makri, K. (2014). Designing pre-service teacher training based on a combination of TPACK and Communities of Inquiry. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3437- 3442.
Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York: Peter Lang.
Qarabaghi, S. & Sultan Mohammadi, Z. (1389). Discussion learning activity: a new approach in virtual education, Journal of Education Strategies, 3 (1), spring 2019, 35-39. http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-70-fa.html. [In Persian].
Ramirez-Velarde, R. Sanhueza-Olave, M. Alexandrov, N. & De Marcos- Ortega, L. (2015). Do learning activities matter? Interactive collaborative and blended learning (ICBL), International Conference on, 76-82.
Scott, T. & Brysiewicz, P. (2016). African emergency nursing curriculum: Development of a curriculum model. International Emergency Nursing, 27, 60-63.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Research, 15(3) 4–14.
Sriklaub, K. Wongwanich, S. (2014). Learning activities aimed at promoting students’ interest: synthesis of master teachers’ activity organizing methods via TV media. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3375 – 3380.
Tabi Bardbar, F. (2015). The effect of mobile phone education on the psychological and academic aspects of students. Curriculum Research Quarterly, 6(1), 127-145. https://doi.org/10.22099/jcr.2016.3842. [In Persian].
Talkhabi, M. (2018). Learning activities (design, implementation and evaluation). Angareh Cultural and Artistic Institute of Cognition and Training. [In Persian].
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. The University of Chicago Press.
)