Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Master's degree in Educational Management, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Educational Management, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

Abstract

the researcher in the present study has examined the competencies required of school principals in the digital era. Due to the nature of the subject and the objectives of the research, a qualitative method has been used. Due to the fact that in this study, based on the perceptions and experiences of principals, assistant principals, and technology experts of schools, the required competencies of school principals are analyzed, therefore, the grounded theory qualitative strategy has been used. Participants in the study were 15 members of the school community who have had experience in participating in virtual courses. The research collection tool included an 8-item protocol containing the main objectives of the research. The justifiability of this protocol was confirmed by expert professors and its reliability was confirmed by reliability method. Individuals' perspectives on the coding process were analyzed using Nvivo software. The results showed that the most important competencies required for school principals in the digital era are summarized in 5 main components including: coordination and cooperation, the need for specialized digital knowledge, the ability to manage virtual systems, changing the structure and rules of the school and changing the Managers' role and style.

Keywords

Apsorn ,A., Sisan, B., & Tungkunanan, P. (2019). Information and Communication Technology Leadership of School Administrators in Thailand. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 639-650.
Brown, C., Czerniewicz, L,. Huang، C. W., & Mayisela, T. (2016). Curriculum for digital education leadership: A concept paper.
 Brown, B. (2013). How Principals Cultivate Technology Integration and Use Professional Learning Networks.
Jameson, J,. Ferrell, G,. Kelly, J,. Walker, S,. & Ryan, M. (2006). Building trust and shared knowledge in communities of e‐learning practice: collaborative leadership in the JISC eLISA and CAMEL lifelong learning projects. British Journal of Educational Technology، 37(6)، 949-967.
Keane, T,. Boden, M., Chalmers, C,. & Williams, M. (2020). Effective principal leadership influencing technology innovation in the classroom. Education and Information Technologies، 25, 5321-5338.
Potter, W., Webb, D., Paul, C., West, E., Bowen, M., Weiss, B., & De Leone, C. (2014). Sixteen years of collaborative learning through active sense-making in physics (CLASP) at UC Davis. American journal of physics82(2), 153-163.
Raman, A,. & Thannimalai, R. (2019). Importance of Technology Leadership for Technology Integration: Gender and Professional Development Perspective. SAGE Open9(4), 2158244019893707.
William Bates, A. (2015). Teaching in a Digital Age,2, Publisher:BCcampus
Yusof, M. R., Mohd Faiz, M. Y., & Ibrahim, M. Y. (2019). Digital leadership among school leaders in Malaysia. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering
Dolan, E., Kosasi, S., & Sari, S. N. (2022). Implementation of Competence-Based Human Resources Management in the Digital Era. Startupreneur Business Digital (SABDA Journal), 1(2), 167-175.
Santana, M., & Díaz-Fernández, M. (2023). Competencies for the artificial intelligence age: visualisation of the state of the art and future perspectives. Review of Managerial Science, 17(6), 1971-2004.
Yadav, A. K. (2022). The essential skills and competencies of LIS professionals in the digital age: Alumni perspectives survey. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 71(8/9), 837-856.
Nwankpa, J. K., Roumani, Y., & Datta, P. (2022). Process innovation in the digital age of business: the role of digital business intensity and knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(5), 1319-1341.
Charmaz, K. (2017). Constructivist grounded theory. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 299-300.