ابوالقاسمی، مهدی، شیخی، علیاکبر، زینلی پور، حسین، و عصاره، علیرضا. (1397). بررسی اصول طراحی راهبردهای ارزشیابی مطلوب در میان دانشآموزان استعداد درخشان شهر اصفهان: یک مطالعه ترکیبی. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی تدریس پژوهی، 6(1)، 41-25.
اسلامی، زهرا. (1391). نیازسنجی آموزشی دانشآموزان تیزهوش مقطع متوسطه شهر بیرجند جهت غنیسازی برنامههای درسی آنان. پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه بیرجند.
بازرگان هرندی، عباس. (1400). مقدمهای بر روشهای تحقیق کیفی و آمیخته: رویکردهای متداول در علوم رفتاری. (4). تهران: دید آور.
توابی، لیلا. (1390). بررسی و مقایسه راهبردهای فراشناختی در بین دانشآموزان دختر تیزهوش و عادی دبیرستانی. پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه زنجان.
جلیلی، اکبر، حجازی، مسعود، انتصار فومنی، غلامحسین، و مروتی، ذکراله. (1397). رابطه فراشناخت و عملکرد تحصیلی با میانجیگری حل مسئله، فصلنامه سلامت روان کودک، 5(1)، 92-80.
حسین خانزاده، عباسعلی، همتی علمدارلو، قربان، بابایی، محسن، و بابایی، زینب. (1390). بررسی نگرش معلمان و والدین در مورد نحوه جاگماری آموزشی دانشآموزان تیزهوش دوره راهنمایی شهر رشت در سال 90-1389. فصلنامه روانشناسی افراد استثنایی، 1 (3)، 53-23.
زارعی زوارکی، اسماعیل، ولایتی، الهه، و مرادی، رحیم. (1396). آموزشوپرورش ویژه با رویکرد فناوری. تهران: رشد فرهنگ.
زارعی زوارکی، اسماعیل، رستمی نژاد، محمدعلی، و ایزی، مریم (1390). معماری مجدد آموزش عالی برای دانشجویان با نیازهای آموزشی ویژه بر اساس اصول طراحی جهانی برای یادگیری. روانشناسی افراد استثنائی، 1(1)، (113-1)
سیف، علیاکبر. (1388). روانشناسی پرورشی. تهران: دوران.
شکوهی یکتا، محسن، و پرند، اکرم. (1391). روانشناسی و آموزش تیزهوشان. تهران: تیمورزاده طبیب.
طوفانی نژاد، احسان. (1397). طراحی الگوی آموزشی محیط یادگیری غنی شده با شبکه اجتماعی مجازی و تأثیر آن بر میزان یادگیری و مهارتهای اجتماعی دانشآموزان با آسیب شنوایی در درس علوم. رساله دکتری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.
کلباسی، افسانه. (1391). ارزیابی برنامه درسی مدارس استعدادهای درخشان در دوره راهنمایی و فرآیند فعلی شناسایی دانشآموزان تیزهوش بهمنظور ارائه یک الگوی مطلوب. رساله دکتری، دانشگاه اصفهان.
هومن، حیدرعلی. (1393). راهنمای عملی پژوهش کیفی. تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاهها (سمت).
Abolghasemi, M., Sheikhi, A., Zainalipour, H., & Asareh, A. (2017). Investigating the principles of designing optimal evaluation strategies among gifted students in Isfahan city: A combined study. Scientific Research Quarterly of Teaching and Research, 6(1), 25-41. [In Persian]
Abu, N. K., Akkanat, Ç., & Gökdere, M. (2017). Teachers' views about the education of gifted students in regular classrooms. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 7(2), 87-109.
Akhan, N. E., Çiçek, S., & Kocaağa, G. (2022). Critical and creative perspectives of gifted students on global problems: Global climate change.
Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101131.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101131
Alabbasi, A. M. A., Sultan, Z. M., Karwowski, M., Cross, T. L., & Ayoub, A. E. A. (2023). Self-efficacy in gifted and non-gifted students: A multilevel meta-analysis.
Personality and Individual Differences, 210, 112244.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112244
Bazargan Harandi, A. (2021). An introduction to qualitative and mixed research methods: Common approaches in behavioral sciences (4th ed.). Didavar. [In Persian]
Bennett, L., & Folley, S. (2020). Dashboard literacy: Understanding students' response to learning analytic dashboards. In Mobility, data and learner agency in networked learning (pp. 69-82). Springer.
Böhmová, H., & Roštejnská, M. (2009). Chemistry for gifted and talented: On-line course on talnet. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 11, 14-21.
Dai, Z., Xiong, J., Zhao, L., & Zhu, X. (2023). Smart classroom learning environment preferences of higher education teachers and students in China: An ecological perspective.
Heliyon, 9(6), e16769.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16769
Eichmann, B., Greiff, S., Naumann, J., Brandhuber, L., & Goldhammer, F. (2020). Exploring behavioural patterns during complex problem-solving.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 933-956.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12451
Eslami, Z. (2012). Assessment of the educational needs of gifted high school students in the city of Birjand in order to enrich their curricula [Master's thesis, Birjand University]. [In Persian]
Greene, J. A., Moos, D. C., Azevedo, R., & Winters, F. I. (2008). Exploring differences between gifted and grade-level students' use of self-regulatory learning processes with hypermedia.
Computers & Education, 50(3), 1069-1083.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.004
Gyarmathy, É., & Senior, J. (2018). The inclusion of multiple exceptional gifted students in talent development programmes: Interaction synthesis of both provision form and content.
Gifted Education International, 34(1), 47-63.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429416656500
Homan, H. A. (2013). A practical guide to qualitative research. Organization for Studying and Compiling Humanities Books of Universities (Samt). [In Persian]
Hossein Khanzadeh, A., Hemti Alamdarlou, G., Babaei, M., & Babaei, Z. (2011). Examining the attitude of teachers and parents regarding the educational performance of gifted middle school students in Rasht city in 2009-2019. Quarterly Journal of Psychology of Exceptional People, 1(3), 23-53. [In Persian]
Jakubakynov, B., Berechikidze, I., Kartashova, O., & Kochetkova, G. (2021). RETRACTED: Gifted student's creativity: The role of preliminary orientation and individual learning strategies.
Thinking Skills and Creativity, 100883.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100883
Jalili, A., Hejazi, M., Intisar Fomani, G., & Marvotti, Z. (2017). The relationship between metacognition and academic performance with mediation of problem solving. Child Mental Health Quarterly, 5(1), 80-92. [In Persian]
Jawaid, I., Javed, M. Y., Jaffery, M. H., Akram, A., Safder, U., & Hassan, S. (2020). Robotic system education for young children by collaborative-project-based learning.
Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(1), 178-192.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22184
Jordan, S., & Pereira, N. (2009). Rube goldbergineering: Lessons in teaching engineering design to future engineers. Journal of STEM Education, 10(3-4), 13-21.
Karyotaki, M., & Drigas, A. (2016). Latest trends in problem solving assessment.
International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering, Science & IT (iJES), 4(2), 4-10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v4i2.5800
Kennedy, K., & Farley, J. (2018). Counseling gifted students: School-based considerations and strategies.
International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(3), 361-367.
https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018336194
Kolbasi, A. (2011). Evaluation of the curriculum of schools of brilliant talents in middle school and the current process of identifying gifted students in order to provide a good model [Doctoral dissertation, University of Isfahan]. [In Persian]
Mayer, R. E. (2013). Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models (pp. 141-159). Routledge.
Mutlu, G. (2017). Teaching gifted students through authentic instruction: Reflections from the EFL teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 14(4), 3663-3675.
Nacaroğlu, O., & Bektaş, O. (2023). The effect of the flipped classroom model on gifted students' self-regulation skills and academic achievement.
Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101244.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101244
Renzulli, J. F. (2009). The empire strikes back: Redefining the role of gifted education in the 21st century. In 18th Biennial World Conference: The World Council for Gifted and Talented Children, Vancouver.
Schindler, M., & Rott, B. (2017). Networking theories on giftedness—What we can learn from synthesizing Renzulli's domain general and Krutetskii's mathematics-specific theory.
Education Sciences, 7(1), 6.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010006
Schult, J., Stadler, M., Becker, N., Greiff, S., & Sparfeldt, J. R. (2017). Home alone: Complex problem solving performance benefits from individual online assessment.
Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 513-519.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.054
Seif, A. (2009). Educational psychology. Doran. [In Persian]
Shokohi Yekta, M., & Parand, A. (2012). Psychology and gifted education. Timurzadeh - Tabib. [In Persian]
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science.
Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3-54.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418057
Tavabi, L. (2011). Examining and comparing metacognitive strategies among gifted and normal high school female students [Master's thesis, Zanjan University]. [In Persian]
Tofani Nejad, E. (2017). Designing an educational model of a learning environment enriched with a virtual social network and its effect on the learning rate and social skills of students with hearing impairment in the science course [Doctoral dissertation, Allameh Tabatabai University]. [In Persian]
Troyer, J. A., Tost, J. R., Yoshimura, M., LaFontaine, S. D., & Mabie, A. R. (2012). Teaching students how to meditate can improve level of consciousness and problem solving ability. *Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69*, 153-161.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.394
van der Eem, M., van Drie, J., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Boxtel, C. (2023). Students' evaluation of the trustworthiness of historical sources: Procedural knowledge and task value as predictors of student performance.
The Journal of Social Studies Research, 47(1), 64-76.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2022.05.001
Wagner, K. K., & Dole, S. (2014). Social media in higher education: Using wiki for online gifted education courses. In
Handbook of research on transnational higher education (pp. 730-750). IGI Global.
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4458-8.ch037
Wilhelm, O., & Kyllonen, P. (2021). To predict the future, consider the past: Revisiting Carroll (1993) as a guide to the future of intelligence research.
Intelligence, 89, 101585.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2021.101585
Zaraii Zavarki, E., Rostaminejad, M., & Izzi, M. (2013). Re-architecting higher education for students with special educational needs based on the principles of global design for learning. Psychology of Exceptional People, 1(1), 1-113. [In Persian]
Zaraii Zavarki, E., Velayati, E., & Moradi, R. (2017). Special education with technology approach. Rosh Culture. [In Persian]
Zimlich, S. L. (2015). Using technology in gifted and talented education classrooms: The teachers' perspective.
Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 14, 101-124.
https://doi.org/10.28945/2157
)